What the other Steve has to say...
                                Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak talks to LAPTOP about Leopard, the iPhone, and the future of computing. 
                              It's been more than three decades since Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs formed Apple Computer, where "the Woz" brought the Apple I and II to life, and where  he played a critical role in bringing the original Macintosh to market.  He's considered one of the most influential people in the history of  personal computing, and his passion for producing easy-to-use software  is still very much a part of Apple's DNA. On the eve of the Leopard launch, we asked Wozniak whether Apple was staying true to its roots and what innovations he'd like to see become a reality. 
                              
                                    
 
                                     
                                     
                                   Steve Wozniak, 2007   
                                   
LAPTOP: How are you keeping busy these days?
 
                                    
                                    Steve Wozniak:  I've been doing various levels of volunteer work on local nonprofit  boards. I also do regular speaking engagements around the world about  my experience. I started a financial type company with a couple Apple  executives, and we acquired a chip maker in Southern California. And we  are called Jazz Technologies. At this point I haven't taken a role yet  and am trying to figure out what part I will play.
                                   
                                   
L: Will you be switching to Leopard? Have you tried Vista?
                                    
                                    
                                       Woz:  Yes,  I will [switch to Leopard], the first day it comes out. I really don't  know anything about it; I like to be surprised when I first play around  with it. No, I haven't tried Vista. I bought Parallels, but I didn't install it. I don't have any desire to try out Vista and haven't seen the need to yet.                                    
                                    L: You were recently quoted as saying that a lot of  the intuitiveness had gone away from Apple's programs. Do you think  Leopard might change that?
                                    
                                    Woz:  Early on with the first Apples, we had these dreams that the computer would let you know what you wanted to do. The idea was that little  icons or words would suggest what you wanted to do, but now I have to  find my way around to odd little icons that aren't positioned in the  prominent places. When conducting a common task, I have to go searching  around in folders or the bottom of the screen. I don't think any of it  will be solved with Leopard because I don't think there is incentive  to. They want to make things easy, and if it seems easy and it can be  demonstrated quickly then it's okay. The real dreams of how it will  work for someone who knows nothing about the computer have been lost  and don't get addressed anymore. 
                                      
                                      
                                      L: What about the aesthetic appeal of the OS?
                                      
                                      Woz:  I don't think it makes it easier or harder. I think it's just more fun. 
                                      
                                      
                                      
                                      L: Do you think Linux has a lot of potential?
                                      
                                      Woz:  I don't think it's going to make a big mark. The masses of users aren't  going to be going that way. You have to be in a geeky crowd to take  advantage of that. You have to be an expert, and not everyone is an  expert. In my mind, it's very idealistic people, but most people want  to take it easy. 
                                    L: Mac's notebook market share has climbed as high as 8.8 percent in the U.S. How much higher do you think it can go? 
                                    
                                    Woz:  I think Macintosh has a lot higher market share than it's ever credited  for. I think normal people who buy and use computers on their own  choose Macs. It's close to a 50/50 split in my mind. It's businesses  that are buying thousands of Microsoft PCs, and there are tons of  countries where Apple isn't sold at all.                                     
                                    
L: Do you think Leopard will provide a boost? 
                                    
                                    Woz:  I don't think any operating system, despite all its promises, is what  sells a computer nowadays. I think OS changes are just done to keep  your loyal people happy. Learning an entirely new operating system is  something no one wants to do. You get stuck on a platform, and you  don't want to start learning a whole new computer system.
                                    
 
                                    
                                  
L: Now that the browser itself is a computing platform, do you think operating systems are starting to become less relevant? 
                                                                             Woz: I think that's exactly where we are headed, if not already there. Even  Apple is looking forward to where computers are, after the operating  system isn't important. Apple has already taken its way into the living  room and entertainment system. They have a huge advantage in this  space. They have the OS, the hardware, the applications, and the online  services, and they get them to all work together. A company like  Hewlett-Packard, on the other hand, can make a computer and have great  ideas, but it boils down to the software element, and they're  restricted by what Microsoft provides as an operating system.                                            
                                      L: Does innovation mean the same thing today as it did ten years ago? 
                                                                            Woz: A long time ago when we started Apple, there was an incredible focus on  the single person. Without anyone helping them, one person could have  the skills and how-to to manage the technical details and the design.  There were a lot of build-it-yourselfers. And that led to a lot of  innovation. But today in all things electronics and technology,  everything is so complicated, and there are various levels of  expertise. Innovation changed in that sense. I think innovation occurs  in lots of other areas now. The Internet brought about a whole new  round of innovation for applications and Web sites. Ten years ago, who  could have said what the Internet could have spurred on in terms of  innovation? 
                                      L: What about hardware? 
                                                                            Woz: As for hardware innovation, these days the market is so big and there  is so much money in it that it's usually the purview of people with big  money, and very few of them take big risks and do something very new  and different. Apple is one of the exceptions. It really comes down to  packaging technologies with hardware now. For instance, you can buy  little camera media cards. What people don't realize is that a 4GB card  has four chips linked together. Take the iPhone: How can you get  something as thin as a credit card with so much functionality? 
                                      L: Is there anything you would change about the iPhone?
                                                                            Woz: I think it could be more like a computer. It should be open like a  computer. Anyone should be able to develop their own games and programs  on it. And keep the phone and the phone services off guard so it's  protected. 
                                      L: So you're in favor of the unlocking and jailbreaking for third-party applications? 
                                                                            Woz: From a business point of view, Apple owns what they have done. They  have a right to lock it. But I am really for the unlockers, the rebels  trying to make it free. I'd really like it to be open to new  applications. I'd like to install some nice games. Why in the world can  I not install a ringtone that I've made? How would that hurt AT&T's  network? Here is Steve Jobs sending letters to the record companies  saying [they] should provide music that's unprotected, but here he is  taking the opposite approach with the iPhone. I don't know to what  extent AT&T is involved in the thinking and direction. 
                                      L: Does carrying one phone cut it for you?
                                                                            Woz: I really like to be a technology buff and offer advice to people on  devices and be in the know. I'm enamored with different features in  different phones. For some of the phones it's the style that I like,  for example, Bang & Olufsen's device. The iPhone is just a "got to  have" because everyone knows what it is. I like my little BlackBerry  Pearl because I like the size for what it does. It's a creditable smart  phone but not very pleasing for Internet surfing. I like my RAZR  because it has better voice quality than the iPhone; it's a bit louder.  Someday I will switch to the iPhone for voice. 
                                      L: Beyond touch, how would you like to see user interfaces evolve? 
                                                                            Woz: I don't think anything revolutionary is close on the horizon, but I  guess you never know. I didn't think the iPhone would be as pleasing. I  was really surprised. Eventually, I would love a little computer with a  camera that recognizes me, and I can throw a lot of little gestures at  it, and it responds to what I say and do. It will be very hard to  create a computer that can understand our voice and our rhythm.